Rebuking The Vulnerability 1

It has been billions and trillions of years since the birth of man.He is unique,his brilliance unpareiled and his achievements countless.Nonetheless his courage is dubious and defences harmful(though Desfence always is,but he surpassed in this respect the rest of the creatures to the extent that its damages are unsurpassed and matchless).The fact is that the more lethal defence one choses more vulnerable it turn out to be.So is the case of nuclear weapons,which were once considered the best defense ever,but what has come up with them we all know.Which was once supposed to threat has turned out to be the most threatened at hands of unwanted non-state elements.However the defence,that man adopts,can be of two types: active or passive.The later defence involves using soft powers and is invoked against both the passive and active threat.Whereas the former is adopted to silence or even eliminate suspected threats as are always used by imperialists.In the Medieval ages wars were fought more to terrorise the weaker than to set any real scores.Thats what today's imperialists are doing.The fight for extending the areas of influence is becoming riskier with every passing day.Such efforts win both: the influence as well as temptation.Influence in the subjective area where the defensive force is applied,temptaion of the defeated,whose interests are quelled or marred in the certain region.Thats exactly what ------- is doing.First act of -------,after winning control over ---- was to stop oil exportss from Iraq to -----.Such blatant acts might have earned the imperialists of today or of the past some name but more foes than friend.Thats the tragedy of the kingpins. They always to how to dominate.The reins,in their hands, controling the feable,never slip from their grip,while the same reins controling their own tendensies,know no limitations.But oppressors are not to be blamed alone for this questionable and misguided state of affairs.The fact is both the oppressor as well as the oppressed are responsible for this flawed philosophy of life in which the former consider the wealth and weapons the symbols of strength.To them raising the arms,inflicting wars,silencing the voice of difference, taking defensive against the yet to be born threats are the rules of supriority.While this is quite another issue that they never bother to realise the very obvious fact that by doing so they themselves call the vulnerability upon themselves.On the othe hand the oppressed know nothing,neither repsct nor resistence,but fear.Till the moment the powerfull is maneuvering to keep them oppressed they never raise their voice neither for justice nor for sighing.But once given even a little room to vent their emotions their voices chant nothing but rebelion, and their satisfaction lies in nothing less than eliminating their oppressors and thus in inflicting vengeance.Hence the world can rightly be devided into two groups.One, of the masters and the other of the slaves,while none knows to think inclusively and unconventionally.This is where the vulnerability lies in reality.It s not the financial status,weaponary stockpiles or brilliant and technical brains that is the symbole of true strength and victory.And nothing is going to effact this dangerous status quo till the the society is dedoctrinated,till it is not learned that the strength lies,not in using it but in sparing it.Bravery is not in carrying the arms but in throwing them for the cause of humanity, in silencing,not our alledged rivals but our true enemies which are our own fears,egoes and interests.Likewise the oppressed must be tought what the accurate meaning of freedom is.Freedom is not the ability to to become whatever one was not or could not be prior to acquiring it (be that a nemises for the oppressor or oppressor themselves) ,but in having the sense and desire for justice and equity and hence a tendency to pursue them.